You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Therapeutic Effects of Natural Compounds Against Saprolegnia spp. (Oomycota) and Amyloodinium ocellatum (Dinophyceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Perla Tedesco, Paola Beraldo, Michela Massimo, Maria Letizia Fioravanti, Donatella Volpatti, Ron Dirks, Roberta Galuppi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,475,135
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,355
of 6,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,834
of 361,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#101
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.