You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Use of Meta-Analysis for the Measurement of Animal Disease Burden: Losses Due to Clinical Mastitis as an Example
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Didier Raboisson, Ahmed Ferchiou, Beate Pinior, Thomas Gautier, Pierre Sans, Guillaume Lhermie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,739,690
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#838
of 6,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,401
of 367,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#43
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.