You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ticks and Associated Pathogens From Rescued Wild Animals in Rainforest Fragments of Northeastern Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maísa Santos Fonseca, Thiago Campanharo Bahiense, Aretha Alves Borges Silva, Valeria Castilho Onofrio, Thiago Doria Barral, Barbara Maria Paraná Souza, Rejane Maria Lira-da-Silva, Ilka Biondi, Roberto Meyer, Ricardo Wagner Portela |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,478,213
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,357
of 6,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,791
of 373,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#106
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.