You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antimicrobial Usage in Horses: The Use of Electronic Data, Data Curation, and First Results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Schnepf, Astrid Bienert-Zeit, Hatice Ertugrul, Rolf Wagels, Nicole Werner, Maria Hartmann, Karsten Feige, Lothar Kreienbrock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 14 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,193,902
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,126
of 6,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,848
of 377,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#103
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.