You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Addressing Individual Values to Impact Prudent Antimicrobial Prescribing in Animal Agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurel E. Redding, Cecilia Brooks, Christine B. Georgakakos, Greg Habing, Leah Rosenkrantz, Michael Dahlstrom, Paul J. Plummer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,681,342
of 23,211,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,939
of 6,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,914
of 395,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#91
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,211,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.