You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Meat Safety in Northern Tanzania: Inspectors' and Slaughter Workers' Risk Perceptions and Management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00309 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linda Waldman, Tabitha A. Hrynick, Jackie Benschop, Sarah Cleaveland, John A. Crump, Margaret A. Davis, Boniface Mariki, Blandina T. Mmbaga, Niwael Mtui-Malamsha, Gerard Prinsen, Joanne Sharp, Emmanuel S. Swai, Kate M. Thomas, Ruth N. Zadoks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,613,586
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,162
of 6,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,501
of 399,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#142
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.