You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Welfare Impact of Carbon Dioxide Euthanasia on Laboratory Mice and Rats: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia V. Turner, Debra L. Hickman, Judith van Luijk, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, Jan M. Sargeant, T. Miki Kurosawa, Takashi Agui, Vera Baumans, Woo Sung Choi, Yang-Kyu Choi, Paul A. Flecknell, Byeong H. Lee, Pedro J. Otaegui, Kathleen R. Pritchett-Corning, Keisuke Shimada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Estonia | 1 | 8% |
| Comoros | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,930,844
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#932
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,165
of 430,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#51
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.