You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Profiling Detection and Classification of Lameness Methods in British Dairy Cattle Research: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.00542 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
João Sucena Afonso, Mieghan Bruce, Patrick Keating, Didier Raboisson, Helen Clough, George Oikonomou, Jonathan Rushton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 23 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,563,348
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,414
of 6,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,309
of 400,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#86
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.