↓ Skip to main content

Bubalus bubalis: A Short Story

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bubalus bubalis: A Short Story
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.570413
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Humberto Hamad Minervino, Marco Zava, Domenico Vecchio, Antonio Borghese

Abstract

The domestic buffalo (Bubalus bubalis), also known as water buffalo or Asian buffalo to prevent confusion with the American bison (Bison bison), wrongly named buffalo in North America, comprises two subspecies: the river buffalo (B. bubalis bubalis) and the swamp buffalo (B. bubalis kerebau). The swamp buffalo has a consistent phenotype and is considered as one type, even if many breeds are recognized within it; conversely, the river buffalo subspecies has many breeds. We found limited information available regarding the worldwide distribution of buffaloes. The best estimate is that 208,098,759 buffalo head are distributed in 77 countries in five continents. In this review, we presented the basic aspects of the water buffalo and unraveled the buffalo path followed from the origin of the species to its current global distribution. We reviewed several data sources to provide a better estimate of the world buffalo count and distribution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 14 8%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Lecturer 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 88 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 23 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 88 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,086,703
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#765
of 8,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,778
of 525,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#48
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.