You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulating Surgical Skills in Animals: Systematic Review, Costs & Acceptance Analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.570852 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantin D. Bergmeister, Martin Aman, Anne Kramer, Thilo L. Schenck, Otto Riedl, Simeon C. Daeschler, Oskar C. Aszmann, Helga Bergmeister, Mohammad Golriz, Arianeb Mehrabi, Gabriel Hundeshagen, Perenlei Enkhbaatar, Michael P. Kinsky, Bruno K. Podesser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,090,068
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,593
of 6,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,904
of 411,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#223
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.