↓ Skip to main content

Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Cryptosporidium Infections in Africa—How Important Is Zoonotic Transmission? A Review of the Evidence
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.575881
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy J. Robertson, Øystein Haarklau Johansen, Tsegabirhan Kifleyohannes, Akinwale Michael Efunshile, Getachew Terefe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 49 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 55 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,004,469
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,071
of 6,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,445
of 415,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#126
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.