| Title |
A Qualitative Market Analysis Applied to Mini-FLOTAC and Fill-FLOTAC for Diagnosis of Helminth Infections in Ruminants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.580649 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Paola Maurelli, Oliva Maria Dourado Martins, Eric R. Morgan, Johannes Charlier, Giuseppe Cringoli, Teresa Letra Mateus, Bogdan Bacescu, Christophe Chartier, Edwin Claerebout, Theo de Waal, Christina Helm, Hubertus Hertzberg, Barbara Hinney, Johan Höglund, Iveta Angela Kyriánová, Marcin Mickiewicz, Saulius Petkevičius, Stanislav Simin, Smaragda Sotiraki, Marina Tosheska, Mariann Toth, María Martínez-Valladares, Marian Varady, Blagica Sekovska, Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Laura Rinaldi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Librarian | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,513,547
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,366
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,308
of 419,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#142
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.