| Title |
Emerging Zoonotic Diseases: Should We Rethink the Animal–Human Interface?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.582743 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ioannis Magouras, Victoria J. Brookes, Ferran Jori, Angela Martin, Dirk Udo Pfeiffer, Salome Dürr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Mexico | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 74% |
| Scientists | 11 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 418 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 149 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 10% |
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Unknown | 105 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 154 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Unknown | 119 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#460,574
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#115
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,196
of 440,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.