↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Imaging in Intervertebral Disc Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic Imaging in Intervertebral Disc Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2020.588338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronaldo C. da Costa, Steven De Decker, Melissa J. Lewis, Holger Volk, The Canine Spinal Cord Injury Consortium, Sarah A. Moore, Natasha J. Olby, Jonathan M. Levine, Melissa J. Lewis, Nick D. Jeffery, Maureen E. Mullins, Ronaldo C. da Costa, Yvette S. Nout-Lomas, Joe Fenn, Nicolas Granger, Ingo Spitzbarth, Veronika M. Stein, Andrea Tipold, Ji-Hey Lim, Holger Volk

Abstract

Imaging is integral in the diagnosis of canine intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) and in differentiating subtypes of intervertebral disc herniation (IVDH). These include intervertebral disc extrusion (IVDE), intervertebral disc protrusion (IVDP) and more recently recognized forms such as acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE), hydrated nucleus pulposus extrusion (HNPE), and intradural/intramedullary intervertebral disc extrusion (IIVDE). Many imaging techniques have been described in dogs with roles for survey radiographs, myelography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Given how common IVDH is in dogs, a thorough understanding of the indications and limitations for each imaging modality to aid in diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis is essential to successful case management. While radiographs can provide useful information, especially for identifying intervertebral disc degeneration or calcification, there are notable limitations. Myelography addresses some of the constraints of survey radiographs but has largely been supplanted by cross-sectional imaging. Computed tomography with or without myelography and MRI is currently utilized most widely and have become the focus of most contemporary studies on this subject. Novel advanced imaging applications are being explored in dogs but are not yet routinely performed in clinical patients. The following review will provide a comprehensive overview on common imaging modalities reported to aid in the diagnosis of IVDH including IVDE, IVDP, ANNPE, HNPE, and IIVDE. The review focuses primarily on canine IVDH due to its frequency and vast literature as opposed to feline IVDH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 256 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Other 28 11%
Student > Master 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 124 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 90 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Unspecified 5 2%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 128 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,876,086
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#2,024
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,772
of 441,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#103
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.