You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transferable Resistance to Highest Priority Critically Important Antibiotics for Human Health in Escherichia coli Strains Obtained From Livestock Feces in Uruguay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.588919 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Coppola, Bibiana Freire, Ana Umpiérrez, Nicolás F. Cordeiro, Pablo Ávila, Gustavo Trenchi, Gustavo Castro, María Laura Casaux, Martín Fraga, Pablo Zunino, Inés Bado, Rafael Vignoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 3 | 38% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,716,279
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#830
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,653
of 507,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#51
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.