You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Key Considerations for the Use of Seaweed to Reduce Enteric Methane Emissions From Cattle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.597430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Vijn, Devan Paulus Compart, Nikki Dutta, Athanasios Foukis, Matthias Hess, Alexander N. Hristov, Kenneth F. Kalscheur, Ermias Kebreab, Sergey V. Nuzhdin, Nichole N. Price, Yan Sun, Juan M. Tricarico, Adele Turzillo, Martin R. Weisbjerg, Charles Yarish, Timothy D. Kurt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 16 | 21% |
| United States | 11 | 14% |
| Australia | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 77% |
| Scientists | 16 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 283 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 118 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 15 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 131 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 189. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#210,773
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#73
of 8,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,020
of 520,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.