You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of Three Different Sterilization Methods of Tilapia Skin Dressing: Impact on Microbiological Enumeration and Collagen Content
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2020.597751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmed Ibrahim, Dalia Hassan, Noura Kelany, Saber Kotb, Mahmoud Soliman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 23% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,438,721
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,020
of 8,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,861
of 520,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#56
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.