↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison Between Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training and Conventional Over-Ground Training in Dogs With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison Between Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Training and Conventional Over-Ground Training in Dogs With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2021.597949
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ângela Martins, Débora Gouveia, Ana Cardoso, Inês Viegas, Óscar Gamboa, António Ferreira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Other 6 14%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,187
of 6,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,430
of 442,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#205
of 460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.