↓ Skip to main content

Bovine Abortions Revisited—Enhancing Abortion Diagnostics by 16S rDNA Amplicon Sequencing and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bovine Abortions Revisited—Enhancing Abortion Diagnostics by 16S rDNA Amplicon Sequencing and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2021.623666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Godelind Alma Wolf-Jäckel, Mikael Lenz Strube, Kirstine Klitgaard Schou, Christiane Schnee, Jørgen S. Agerholm, Tim Kåre Jensen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,662,853
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,903
of 6,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,887
of 418,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#115
of 368 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 368 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.