You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Existence and Quality of Data on Control Programs for EU Non-regulated Cattle Diseases: Consequences for Estimation and Comparison of the Probability of Freedom From Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2021.689375 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Egle Rapaliute, Annika van Roon, Gerdien van Schaik, Inge Santman-Berends, Xhelil Koleci, Madalina Mincu, Jörn Gethmann, Beate Conrady, Tanja Knific, Jaka Jakob Hodnik, John Berezowski, Luís Pedro Carmo, Aurélien Madouasse, Attila Tarpai, Anton Gerilovych, Alvydas Malakauskas, Blagica Sekovska, Christine Fourichon, Emmanouil Kalaitzakis, Franz-Ferdinand Roch, Hans Houe, Katarzyna Dudek, Kerli Mõtus, László Ózsvári, Lina Costa, Maria Guelbenzu-Gonzalo, Madeleine K. Henry, Mentor Alishani, Nicola Pozzato, Petter Hopp, Ramon Juste, Sam Strain, Rene Mandelik, Štefan Vilček, Tiina Autio, Lena-Mari Tamminen, Céline Faverjon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 19 | 42% |
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 22 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,803,838
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,726
of 7,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,208
of 427,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#99
of 460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.