You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum infection and associated risk factors in cattle in Shanxi Province, north China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.1053270 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hui Cao, Wen-Bin Zheng, Yu Wang, Wen-Wei Gao, Qing Liu, Xing-Quan Zhu, Yu-Ping Lei, Bayaer Tumen, Hong-Yu Song |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,728,392
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,252
of 6,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,086
of 439,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#263
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.