↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Stocking density, restricted trough space, and implications for sheep behaviour and biological functioning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Stocking density, restricted trough space, and implications for sheep behaviour and biological functioning
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2022.1077412
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie T. Mayes, L. Amy Tait, Frances C. Cowley, John M. Morton, Brendan P. Doyle, Muhammad A. Arslan, Peta S. Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#20,581,703
of 23,164,913 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,439
of 6,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,672
of 438,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#393
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,164,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.