You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bovine Tuberculosis Antemortem Diagnostic Test Agreement and Disagreement in a Naturally Infected African Cattle Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.877534 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert F. Kelly, Lina Gonzaléz Gordon, Nkongho F. Egbe, Emily J. Freeman, Stella Mazeri, Victor N. Ngwa, Vincent Tanya, Melissa Sander, Lucy Ndip, Adrian Muwonge, Kenton L. Morgan, Ian G. Handel, Barend M. de C. Bronsvoort |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,565,040
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,908
of 6,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,903
of 435,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#122
of 615 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 615 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.