↓ Skip to main content

Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical Bleeding in Dogs With Anticoagulant Rodenticide Toxicity—A Multi-Center Evaluation of 62 Cases (2010–2020)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical Bleeding in Dogs With Anticoagulant Rodenticide Toxicity—A Multi-Center Evaluation of 62 Cases (2010–2020)
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2022.879179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Stroope, Rebecca Walton, Jonathan Paul Mochel, Lingnan Yuan, Brittany Enders

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 47%
Unknown 18 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,602,517
of 23,876,851 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,384
of 7,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,330
of 427,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#65
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,876,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.