You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two kinds of traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions reduce thymic inflammation levels and improve humoral immunity of finishing pigs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2022.929112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoyu Wang, Jiajia Chen, Fan Yang, Farah Ali, Yaqin Mao, Aiming Hu, Tianfang Xu, Yan Yang, Feibing Wang, Guangbin Zhou, Xiaowang Guo, Huabin Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,096,748
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,129
of 7,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,901
of 422,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#200
of 570 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 570 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.