↓ Skip to main content

The beneficial effects of traditional Chinese medicine on antioxidative status and inflammatory cytokines expression in the liver of piglets

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The beneficial effects of traditional Chinese medicine on antioxidative status and inflammatory cytokines expression in the liver of piglets
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2022.937745
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyu Wang, Yun Wang, Yaqin Mao, Aiming Hu, Tianfang Xu, Yan Yang, Feibing Wang, Guangbin Zhou, Xiaowang Guo, Huabin Cao, Fan Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,896,869
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,317
of 6,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,318
of 437,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#298
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.