You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancements in veterinary medicine: the use of Flowgy for nasal airflow simulation and surgical predictions in big felids (a case study in lions)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1181036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Burgos, Alejandro Pérez-Ramos, Baptiste Mulot, Daniel Sanz-Prieto, Francisco Esteban, Markus Bastir |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,982,612
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,365
of 8,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,290
of 350,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#167
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.