↓ Skip to main content

Case report: Fundic gland polyps caused by long-term omeprazole use in a Maltese dog

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case report: Fundic gland polyps caused by long-term omeprazole use in a Maltese dog
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2023.1287335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haemin Lee, Sanggu Kim, Dohee Lee, Yeon Chae, Taesik Yun, Mhan-Pyo Yang, Byeong-Teck Kang, Soochong Kim, Hakhyun Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,152,841
of 24,771,057 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,942
of 7,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,853
of 215,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#110
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,771,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.