You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancements in copy number variation screening in herbivorous livestock genomes and their association with phenotypic traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2023.1334434 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaotong Liu, Wenting Chen, Bingjian Huang, Xinrui Wang, Yongdong Peng, Xinhao Zhang, Wenqiong Chai, Muhammad Zahoor Khan, Changfa Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,924,291
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,349
of 8,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,441
of 351,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#199
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.