You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High clonality of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis field isolates from red deer revealed by two different methodological approaches of comparative genomic analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1301667 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia Turco, Simone Russo, Daniele Pietrucci, Anita Filippi, Marco Milanesi, Camilla Luzzago, Chiara Garbarino, Giorgia Palladini, Giovanni Chillemi, Matteo Ricchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,698,132
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#6,667
of 7,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,819
of 153,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#127
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.