You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fecal PCR survey and genome analysis of Lawsonia intracellularis in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2024.1324768 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lei Wang, Wenqing Wu, Lifeng Zhao, Zhanwei Zhu, Xinzhi Yao, Jie Fan, Hongjian Chen, Wenbo Song, Xi Huang, Lin Hua, Ping Qian, Huanchun Chen, Zhong Peng, Bin Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,663,327
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#5,297
of 8,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,248
of 213,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#162
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.