↓ Skip to main content

Long non-coding RNA Loc105611671 promotes the proliferation of ovarian granulosa cells and steroid hormone production upregulation of CDC42

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long non-coding RNA Loc105611671 promotes the proliferation of ovarian granulosa cells and steroid hormone production upregulation of CDC42
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1366759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinglei Wang, Hanying Chen, Yongsheng Zhang, Hong Shen, Xiancun Zeng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,310,527
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#4,044
of 8,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,977
of 149,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#68
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.