↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a quality of life and treatment satisfaction measure in canine osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a quality of life and treatment satisfaction measure in canine osteoarthritis
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2024.1377019
Authors

Edwina Gildea, Emma Scales-Theobald, Jill Thompson, Alasdair Cook, Katie Forde, George Skingley, Sophie Lawrie, Nicola Williamson, Charlotte Panter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,223,250
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#6,882
of 8,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,848
of 174,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#62
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.