You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COVID-19 in German Competitive Sports: Protocol for a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study (CoSmo-S)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604414 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Michael Niess, Manuel Widmann, Roman Gaidai, Christian Gölz, Isabel Schubert, Katty Castillo, Jan Philipp Sachs, Daniel Bizjak, Shirin Vollrath, Fritz Wimbauer, Azin Vogel, Karsten Keller, Christof Burgstahler, Anne Quermann, Arno Kerling, Gerald Schneider, Jonas Zacher, Katharina Diebold, Maximilian Grummt, Claudia Beckendorf, Johannes Buitenhuis, Florian Egger, Andreas Venhorst, Oliver Morath, Friedrich Barsch, Klaus-Peter Mellwig, Julian Oesterschlink, Jan Wüstenfeld, Hans-Georg Predel, Peter Deibert, Birgit Friedmann-Bette, Frank Mayer, Anja Hirschmüller, Martin Halle, Jürgen Michael Steinacker, Bernd Wolfarth, Tim Meyer, Erwin Böttinger, Marion Flechtner-Mors, Wilhelm Bloch, Bernhard Haller, Kai Roecker, Claus Reinsberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#1,151
of 1,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,511
of 519,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#24
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.