You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing for COVID-19 is Much More Effective When Performed Immediately Prior to Social Mixing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604659 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chad R. Wells, Senay Gokcebel, Abhishek Pandey, Alison P. Galvani, Jeffrey P. Townsend |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 25% |
| Mexico | 13 | 15% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 76% |
| Scientists | 12 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 67% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#357,397
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#23
of 1,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,519
of 434,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#2
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.