You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ontologies for Neuroscience: What are they and What are they Good for?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3389/neuro.01.007.2009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen D. Larson, Maryann E. Martone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 25 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,400
of 11,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,102
of 104,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.