You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relational Memory and the Hippocampus: Representations and Methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3389/neuro.01.023.2009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Konkel, Neal J. Cohen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 348 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 15% |
| Researcher | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 164 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 46 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 76 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,033,993
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,032
of 10,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,488
of 93,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.