↓ Skip to main content

Temporal Interactions between Cortical Rhythms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal Interactions between Cortical Rhythms
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2008
DOI 10.3389/neuro.01.034.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita K. Roopun, Mark A. Kramer, Lucy M. Carracedo, Marcus Kaiser, Ceri H. Davies, Roger D. Traub, Nancy J. Kopell, Miles A. Whittington

Abstract

Multiple local neuronal circuits support different, discrete frequencies of network rhythm in neocortex. Relationships between different frequencies correspond to mechanisms designed to minimise interference, couple activity via stable phase interactions, and control the amplitude of one frequency relative to the phase of another. These mechanisms are proposed to form a framework for spectral information processing. Individual local circuits can also transform their frequency through changes in intrinsic neuronal properties and interactions with other oscillating microcircuits. Here we discuss a frequency transformation in which activity in two co-active local circuits may combine sequentially to generate a third frequency whose period is the concatenation sum of the original two. With such an interaction, the intrinsic periodicity in each component local circuit is preserved - alternate, single periods of each original rhythm form one period of a new frequency - suggesting a robust mechanism for combining information processed on multiple concurrent spatiotemporal scales.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 5%
United Kingdom 14 4%
Germany 7 2%
Italy 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 327 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 101 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 26%
Professor 33 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 7%
Student > Master 26 7%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 31 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 28%
Neuroscience 73 19%
Psychology 55 14%
Engineering 25 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 54 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,602
of 11,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,296
of 186,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.