↓ Skip to main content

Reward Networks in the Brain as Captured by Connectivity Measures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reward Networks in the Brain as Captured by Connectivity Measures
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.01.034.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Estela Camara, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells, Zheng Ye, Thomas F. Münte

Abstract

An assortment of human behaviors is thought to be driven by rewards including reinforcement learning, novelty processing, learning, decision making, economic choice, incentive motivation, and addiction. In each case the ventral tegmental area/ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) (VTA-VS) system has been implicated as a key structure by functional imaging studies, mostly on the basis of standard, univariate analyses. Here we propose that standard functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis needs to be complemented by methods that take into account the differential connectivity of the VTA-VS system in the different behavioral contexts in order to describe reward based processes more appropriately. We first consider the wider network for reward processing as it emerged from animal experimentation. Subsequently, an example for a method to assess functional connectivity is given. Finally, we illustrate the usefulness of such analyses by examples regarding reward valuation, reward expectation and the role of reward in addiction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Germany 4 2%
Spain 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 210 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 26%
Researcher 47 20%
Professor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 9%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 21 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 17%
Neuroscience 36 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 30 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,930,387
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,404
of 9,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,317
of 164,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.