↓ Skip to main content

Functional Maps of Neocortical Local Circuitry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
368 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
655 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional Maps of Neocortical Local Circuitry
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2007
DOI 10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.002.2007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex M. Thomson, Christophe Lamy

Abstract

This review aims to summarize data obtained with different techniques to provide a functional map of the local circuit connections made by neocortical neurones, a reference for those interested in cortical circuitry and the numerical information required by those wishing to model the circuit. A brief description of the main techniques used to study circuitry is followed by outline descriptions of the major classes of neocortical excitatory and inhibitory neurones and the connections that each layer makes with other cortical and subcortical regions. Maps summarizing the projection patterns of each class of neurone within the local circuit and tables of the properties of these local circuit connections are provided.This review relies primarily on anatomical studies that have identified the classes of neurones and their local and long distance connections and on paired intracellular and whole-cell recordings which have documented the properties of the connections between them. A large number of different types of synaptic connections have been described, but for some there are only a few published examples and for others the details that can only be obtained with paired recordings and dye-filling are lacking. A further complication is provided by the range of species, technical approaches and age groups used in these studies. Wherever possible the range of available data are summarised and compared. To fill some of the more obvious gaps for the less well-documented cases, data obtained with other methods are also summarized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 655 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 3%
Germany 7 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Greece 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 599 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 193 29%
Researcher 161 25%
Student > Master 57 9%
Student > Bachelor 35 5%
Professor 33 5%
Other 108 16%
Unknown 68 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 206 31%
Neuroscience 194 30%
Computer Science 36 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 4%
Psychology 23 4%
Other 76 12%
Unknown 94 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,008,687
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,990
of 11,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,758
of 84,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.