↓ Skip to main content

Persistently Active, Pacemaker-Like Neurons in Neocortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistently Active, Pacemaker-Like Neurons in Neocortex
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2007
DOI 10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.009.2007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morgane Le Bon-Jego, Rafael Yuste

Abstract

The neocortex is spontaneously active, however, the origin of this self-generated, patterned activity remains unknown. To detect potential "pacemaker cells," we use calcium imaging to directly identify neurons that discharge action potentials in the absence of synaptic transmissionin slices from juvenile mouse visual cortex. We characterize 60 of these neurons electrophysiologically and morphologically, finding that they belong to two classes of cells: one class composed of pyramidal neurons with a thin apical dendritic tree and a second class composed of ascending axon interneurons (Martinotti cells) located in layer 5. In both types of neurons, persistent sodium currents are necessary for the generation of the spontaneous activity. Our data demonstrate that subtypes of neocortical neurons have intrinsic mechanisms to generate persistent activity. Like in central pattern generators (CPGs), these neurons may act as "pacemakers" to initiate or pattern spontaneous activity in the neocortex.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Japan 3 1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 187 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 28%
Researcher 51 25%
Student > Master 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 36%
Neuroscience 55 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Engineering 9 4%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 29 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,338,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,040
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,670
of 84,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.