↓ Skip to main content

Manipulating Neuronal Circuits with Endogenous and Recombinant Cell-Surface Tethered Modulators

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manipulating Neuronal Circuits with Endogenous and Recombinant Cell-Surface Tethered Modulators
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.02.021.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mandë Holford, Sebastian Auer, Martin Laqua, Ines Ibañez-Tallon

Abstract

Neuronal circuits depend on the precise regulation of cell-surface receptors and ion channels. An ongoing challenge in neuroscience research is deciphering the functional contribution of specific receptors and ion channels using engineered modulators. A novel strategy, termed "tethered toxins", was recently developed to characterize neuronal circuits using the evolutionary derived selectivity of venom peptide toxins and endogenous peptide ligands, such as lynx1 prototoxins. Herein, the discovery and engineering of cell-surface tethered peptides is reviewed, with particular attention given to their cell-autonomy, modular composition, and genetic targeting in different model organisms. The relative ease with which tethered peptides can be engineered, coupled with the increasing number of neuroactive venom toxins and ligand peptides being discovered, imply a multitude of potentially innovative applications for manipulating neuronal circuits and tissue-specific cell networks, including treatment of disorders caused by malfunction of receptors and ion channels.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 46%
Neuroscience 9 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,250
of 3,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,577
of 108,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them