↓ Skip to main content

Optogenetic Deconstruction of Sleep–Wake Circuitry in the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optogenetic Deconstruction of Sleep–Wake Circuitry in the Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/neuro.02.031.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Adamantidis, Matthew C. Carter, Luis de Lecea

Abstract

How does the brain regulate the sleep-wake cycle? What are the temporal codes of sleep and wake-promoting neural circuits? How do these circuits interact with each other across the light/dark cycle? Over the past few decades, many studies from a variety of disciplines have made substantial progress in answering these fundamental questions. For example, neurobiologists have identified multiple, redundant wake-promoting circuits in the brainstem, hypothalamus, and basal forebrain. Sleep-promoting circuits have been found in the preoptic area and hypothalamus. One of the greatest challenges in recent years has been to selectively record and manipulate these sleep-wake centers in vivo with high spatial and temporal resolution. Recent developments in microbial opsin-based neuromodulation tools, collectively referred to as "optogenetics," have provided a novel method to demonstrate causal links between neural activity and specific behaviors. Here, we propose to use optogenetics as a fundamental tool to probe the necessity, sufficiency, and connectivity of defined neural circuits in the regulation of sleep and wakefulness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Japan 4 2%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 184 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Master 14 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 36%
Neuroscience 52 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Psychology 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 27 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,150
of 3,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,008
of 172,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.