You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Histological Slides and Drawings of Cajal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/neuro.05.009.2010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Garcia-Lopez, Virginia Garcia-Marin, Miguel Freire |
| Abstract |
Ramón y Cajal's studies in the field of neuroscience provoked a radical change in the course of its history. For this reason he is considered as the father of modern neuroscience. Some of his original preparations are housed at the Cajal Museum (Cajal Institute, CSIC, Madrid, Spain). In this article, we catalogue and analyse more than 4,500 of Cajal's histological preparations, the same preparations he used during his scientific career. Furthermore, we catalogued Cajal's original correspondence, both manuscripts and personal letters, drawings and plates. This is the first time anyone has compiled an account of Cajal's enormous scientific production, offering some curious insights into his work and his legacy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 16% |
| Germany | 5 | 7% |
| France | 5 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 71% |
| Scientists | 13 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 250 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 26% |
| Researcher | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Professor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 87 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 75 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#620,145
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#23
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,081
of 174,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.