↓ Skip to main content

Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,416)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2690 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3209 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2008
DOI 10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Marieke Mur, Peter Bandettini

Abstract

A FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGE FOR SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE IS TO QUANTITATIVELY RELATE ITS THREE MAJOR BRANCHES OF RESEARCH: brain-activity measurement, behavioral measurement, and computational modeling. Using measured brain-activity patterns to evaluate computational network models is complicated by the need to define the correspondency between the units of the model and the channels of the brain-activity data, e.g., single-cell recordings or voxels from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Similar correspondency problems complicate relating activity patterns between different modalities of brain-activity measurement (e.g., fMRI and invasive or scalp electrophysiology), and between subjects and species. In order to bridge these divides, we suggest abstracting from the activity patterns themselves and computing representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs), which characterize the information carried by a given representation in a brain or model. Building on a rich psychological and mathematical literature on similarity analysis, we propose a new experimental and data-analytical framework called representational similarity analysis (RSA), in which multi-channel measures of neural activity are quantitatively related to each other and to computational theory and behavior by comparing RDMs. We demonstrate RSA by relating representations of visual objects as measured with fMRI in early visual cortex and the fusiform face area to computational models spanning a wide range of complexities. The RDMs are simultaneously related via second-level application of multidimensional scaling and tested using randomization and bootstrap techniques. We discuss the broad potential of RSA, including novel approaches to experimental design, and argue that these ideas, which have deep roots in psychology and neuroscience, will allow the integrated quantitative analysis of data from all three branches, thus contributing to a more unified systems neuroscience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 64 2%
United Kingdom 28 <1%
Germany 17 <1%
Netherlands 13 <1%
Italy 8 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
France 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
China 4 <1%
Other 27 <1%
Unknown 3031 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 852 27%
Researcher 565 18%
Student > Master 443 14%
Student > Bachelor 248 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 154 5%
Other 442 14%
Unknown 505 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 969 30%
Neuroscience 688 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 251 8%
Computer Science 171 5%
Engineering 127 4%
Other 300 9%
Unknown 703 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#397,062
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#26
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,134
of 185,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them