↓ Skip to main content

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Affects behavior by Biasing Endogenous Cortical Oscillations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Affects behavior by Biasing Endogenous Cortical Oscillations
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, June 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.07.014.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massihullah Hamidi, Heleen A. Slagter, Giulio Tononi, Bradley R. Postle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
United Kingdom 5 3%
Switzerland 3 2%
Canada 3 2%
Netherlands 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 165 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 19%
Student > Master 23 12%
Professor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 34%
Neuroscience 35 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 24 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,666,620
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#395
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,741
of 126,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.