↓ Skip to main content

Altruistic Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Altruistic Learning
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.08.023.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Seymour, Wako Yoshida, Ray Dolan

Abstract

The origin of altruism remains one of the most enduring puzzles of human behaviour. Indeed, true altruism is often thought either not to exist, or to arise merely as a miscalculation of otherwise selfish behaviour. In this paper, we argue that altruism emerges directly from the way in which distinct human decision-making systems learn about rewards. Using insights provided by neurobiological accounts of human decision-making, we suggest that reinforcement learning in game-theoretic social interactions (habitisation over either individuals or games) and observational learning (either imitative of inference based) lead to altruistic behaviour. This arises not only as a result of computational efficiency in the face of processing complexity, but as a direct consequence of optimal inference in the face of uncertainty. Critically, we argue that the fact that evolutionary pressure acts not over the object of learning ('what' is learned), but over the learning systems themselves ('how' things are learned), enables the evolution of altruism despite the direct threat posed by free-riders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 5 4%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 111 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 29%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Computer Science 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 11 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,399
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,647
of 103,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.