↓ Skip to main content

Broca's area, sentence comprehension, and working memory: an fMRI study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Broca's area, sentence comprehension, and working memory: an fMRI study
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2008
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.014.2008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corianne Rogalsky, William Matchin, Gregory Hickok

Abstract

The role of Broca's area in sentence processing remains controversial. According to one view, Broca's area is involved in processing a subcomponent of syntactic processing. Another view holds that it contributes to sentence processing via verbal working memory. Sub-regions of Broca's area have been identified that are more active during the processing of complex (object-relative clause) sentences compared to simple (subject-relative clause) sentences. The present study aimed to determine if this complexity effect can be accounted for in terms of the articulatory rehearsal component of verbal working memory. In a behavioral experiment, subjects were asked to comprehend sentences during concurrent speech articulation which minimizes articulatory rehearsal as a resource for sentence comprehension. A finger-tapping task was used as a control concurrent task. Only the object-relative clause sentences were more difficult to comprehend during speech articulation than during the manual task, showing that articulatory rehearsal does contribute to sentence processing. A second experiment used fMRI to document the brain regions underlying this effect. Subjects judged the plausibility of sentences during speech articulation, a finger-tapping task, or without a concurrent task. In the absence of a secondary task, Broca's area (pars triangularis and pars opercularis) demonstrated an increase in activity as a function of syntactic complexity. However, during concurrent speech articulation (but not finger-tapping) this complexity effect was eliminated in the pars opercularis suggesting that this region supports sentence comprehension via its role in articulatory rehearsal. Activity in the pars triangularis was modulated by the finger-tapping task, but not the speech articulation task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 235 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Researcher 48 19%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Professor 19 8%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 33 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 29%
Neuroscience 37 15%
Linguistics 36 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 43 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,416,129
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,107
of 7,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,057
of 102,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.