↓ Skip to main content

Memory Suppression is an Active Process that Improves Over Childhood

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Memory Suppression is an Active Process that Improves Over Childhood
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, September 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.024.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro M. Paz-Alonso, Simona Ghetti, Bryan J. Matlen, Michael C. Anderson, Silvia A. Bunge

Abstract

We all have memories that we prefer not to think about. The ability to suppress retrieval of unwanted memories has been documented in behavioral and neuroimaging research using the Think/No-Think (TNT) paradigm with adults. Attempts to stop memory retrieval are associated with increased activation of lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and concomitant reduced activation in medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures. However, the extent to which children have the ability to actively suppress their memories is unknown. This study investigated memory suppression in middle childhood using the TNT paradigm. Forty children aged 8-12 and 30 young adults were instructed either to remember (Think) or suppress (No-Think) the memory of the second word of previously studied word-pairs, when presented with the first member as a reminder. They then performed two different cued recall tasks, testing their memory for the second word in each pair after the TNT phase using the same first studied word within the pair as a cue (intra-list cue) and also an independent cue (extra-list cue). Children exhibited age-related improvements in memory suppression from age 8 to 12 in both memory tests, against a backdrop of overall improvements in declarative memory over this age range. These findings suggest that memory suppression is an active process that develops during late childhood, likely due to an age-related refinement in the ability to engage PFC to down-regulate activity in areas involved in episodic retrieval.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 141 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 63%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,695,550
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#2,038
of 7,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,004
of 106,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.