↓ Skip to main content

Brain Imaging Correlates of Cognitive Impairment in Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain Imaging Correlates of Cognitive Impairment in Depression
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, October 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.09.030.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J. Thomas, Rebecca Elliott

Abstract

This review briefly summarises recent research on the neural basis of cognition in depression. Two broad areas are covered: emotional and non-emotional processing. We consider how research findings support models of depression based on disrupted cortico-limbic circuitry, and how modern connectivity analysis techniques can be used to test such models explicitly. Finally we discuss clinical implications of cognitive imaging in depression, and specifically the possible role for these techniques in diagnosis and treatment planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 3 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#3,164
of 7,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,606
of 106,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.